reynardo: (nouveau)
reynardo ([personal profile] reynardo) wrote2006-11-14 01:17 pm

And what bloody world do they live in?

I'm a larger woman. I'm 175cm tall (5' 9" for those metrically-challenged, or 69" for the others). I weigh enough that I'm curved, but not outrageously. In Australia, I take a size 18 for most things, with the occasional incursion into something slightly larger for trousers and smaller for shirts. And it's a pain - you can shop at Woolies or Kmart for polyester joy or hit the tunic-and-Mama-Cass outfits at Maggie T, or track down the odd other one (like the new one that's opened in our shopping centre, that I must check out).

So when I heard on the radio that there's a shop that specialises in nice clothes for the taller woman, my heart went "Woot"! I hoped for something corporate-style, some nice flowing tops like the tiny baby sized girly shops mainstream shops show, and maybe even a denim pinafore.

So I hit the web site.

Most of the clothes are sizes 8-14. To give you an idea, Elle McPherson was a 14 when she still had curves. To be a size 14, I would be slim. To be a size below that, I would be dangerously thin. A couple of size 18 black trousers, and that's it.

While I accept that overweight is a problem, I don't appreciate the message here. They won't even get the publicity of being named here as a result.

[identity profile] psychowoof.livejournal.com 2006-11-15 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
it's amazing how what looks cute in a size 5 looks like clown shoes in a size 8.

You should see it in a 10.5 or 11 (UK 8 or EUR 42)! I've owned shoes that should qualify as land yachts!

[identity profile] wingedkami.livejournal.com 2006-11-15 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I am a UK size 8 (I have no idea of Australian or American shoe sizes). I had a lovely pair of black trainers once that I eventually gave up wearing because they made my feet look so enormous. Small children could have gone canoeing in them.