ext_2077 (
shiv5468.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
reynardo
2012-03-07 08:50 am (UTC)
no subject
Snerk
I was thinking that surely viagra coverage should be restricted to married men without children. After all, if you've already podded there's no need to take it. It'd be just about enjoying sex, and that's wrong, as we know.
(
9 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
I was thinking that surely viagra coverage should be restricted to married men without children. After all, if you've already podded there's no need to take it. It'd be just about enjoying sex, and that's wrong, as we know.