reynardo: (Engineer)
[personal profile] reynardo
Certain of my cow-orkers have been taking short-cuts with the customers. When a customer rings just before the end of their shift, or when they don't want to be taking a long installation (such as the USB driver into Windows 98) they've been telling the customer that they can't help, or to "reboot your machine twice and ring back when that has happened".

Which means some of us who have a bit of a work ethic have been copping the long calls. The diagnoses of firewall blockages. And the glorious Win 98 USb installs that are so fraught with danger and prone to falling over in the middle of them (or just taking 5 minutes for each reboot). Which means it is us poor mugs who end up with the long calls that kill our monthy statistics that these call centres thrive on.

So I did the hard thing today. I asked a supervisor to check to see if the calls are being fobbed off. And to keep an ear out for them. Because when other people get the shining stars by passing off the hard work to those of us with a bit of a work ethic, it hurts.

Re: *hugs*

Date: 2004-10-03 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drzero.livejournal.com
Sounds like the knock on effect to me, "your stats are creating more work for us so would you please conform!!" or words to that effect.

Re: *hugs*

Date: 2004-10-03 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taleya.livejournal.com
That would be believable...if it didn't happen to be bullshit! I was the only phonemonkey who NEVER had a customer call back unhappy or to clarify anything, the only one who passed the monitoring every. single. time. and as we were mostly concerned with creating DSL orders (I worked for the telco that actually owned the cmuxes, so it was codes on the line, etc) and then booking the tech to go out and install, how much work there was depended solely on how many people had ordered DSL that week...

In short, I did my job, I did it fast, we turned over more customers handled and no one was being forced to rework due to my speed. (Unlike what's happening to poor [livejournal.com profile] reynardo)

but noooooooooooooo, didn't fit into the pidgeon hole therefore I was evil.......bastards.

Re: *hugs*

Date: 2004-10-03 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadow-5tails.livejournal.com
Nah - seems to me much more like the good old "Quit it with the efficiency - you're making the rest of us look bad!" line...

Re: *hugs*

Date: 2004-10-03 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drzero.livejournal.com
Kind of my point...

Manager looks at the stats, one person is wrecking the grade curve, as it were. That manager has the option of
a) improving the work-rate of the rest of their staff
b) getting the one good worker to dumb it down so the stats aren't so hard to explain to their next manager up.

The choice is easy. Usually a precursor to someone pointing out why that choice is so wrong. :/

Date: 2004-10-03 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadow-5tails.livejournal.com
Ah.

That's not how I read your initial comment, but when you put it like that, I have to respectfully agree to...er, agree.

*grins and hugs*

Profile

reynardo: (Default)
reynardo

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 02:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios